Wrike Reviews

I'm a big fan of squeezing every additional second of my day, and as such, I'm constantly trying to do more in less time! Wrike keeps my projects on-time & on-budget, while allowing client collaboration.

I haven't found any major issues, perhaps the setup could be a little less involved but if you put in the time, you reap the rewards of a top project management tool.

As a Wrike user, I can say that I am very satisfied with the platform. Wrike offers an intuitive and easy-to-use user interface that allows me to manage projects and tasks with ease. The advanced project management features like portfolio management and custom reporting are great for my daily work.Additionally, Wrike offers customizable workflow and task features, allowing me to tailor the platform to my team's specific needs. The ability to collaborate in real time and to work together with other team members on projects is a huge advantage.

Well, as a Wrike user myself, I have to say that while the platform has many strengths, there are some aspects that need improvement. One of the weaknesses is that Wrike can be a little difficult to use, especially for new users. The user interface can be a little confusing and takes some getting used to. However, once you understand how it works, it becomes much easier to use.Another point that needs to be improved is the customization of the platform. While there are customizable features, they might be a bit limited compared to other project management platforms. Some additional customization options would be welcome.

1- Features for flexible and configurable work management for teams, projects, and individuals.2- integration with a variety of programmes and applications.3- excellent communication features embedded into collaborative software.4- To monitor progress and pinpoint areas for improvement, advanced reporting and analytics are used.5- robust mobile app for efficiency when travelling.6- outstanding client service.

1- For some people, setup and customization might be difficult and time-consuming.2- Some features call for more expensive plans, which might be expensive for smaller organisations or individuals.3- not as user-friendly as some other project management solutions for novices.

Thanks to the platform's flexibility, I've been able to centralize and simplify a great deal of my work. The most exciting feature is the seamless real-time communication and team overview that it provides. In sum, if you're wanting to increase productivity and better manage your workload, Wrike is a tool I'd strongly suggest.

If I had to select one thing, it would be that all the features and options may seem overwhelming at first. It took me some time to learn how to maximize the effectiveness of each feature.

We are able include collaborators to assist move forward stakeholder engagement and communication by giving them get to to as it were the things they ought to see. Dashboards are too a awesome highlight that give customizable information in an easy-to-use organize. The framework plan is such that fundamental utilization can be accomplished with negligible exertion whereas permitting for complex structures for complicated ventures. My favorite part of Wrike is the capacity to form custom errands for each extend, guaranteeing that all perspectives of a extend are taken into consideration.

The most downside I've seen is that there isn't a great put to keep reports related to trade hones or notes that are not related to a venture. Clock wastefulness, we'd cherish to be able to utilize this highlight as a way to keep track of colleagues' time on a venture, but it's not exceptionally doable to do so with the current clock setup.

Wrike has emphatically changed the way we work and track measurements inside, counting financials, time went through on each conveyance, and by and large efficiency and assets. I adore Wrike's customization and ease of utilize, I adore being able to tag bunches, set up automations, and keep track of my ventures. It's flexible and adaptable: clients can customize how they utilize the apparatus, incredible way to see errands and deliverables through dashboards, tables, list sees, etc. Custom workflow is extraordinary when different groups share the same stage for diverse purposes.

The method of getting everything prepared for sending, as well as post-deployment adjustment, wasn't continuously smooth, things took much longer than expected, and a few individuals of the Wrike group regularly needed their client back aptitudes. Wrike can be a bit of a learning bend for more current representatives, and it takes me longer to prepare people. There's no way to create it for outside clients without them marking up for an account, in a perfect world I'd like to produce energetic joins for Gantt charts and dashboards to send to outside clients who can keep up with venture plans.

I enjoy viewing my daily duties in many ways; it is simple and straightforward to set up activities and performances in Wrike, assign them to relevant groups, and collaborate on projects. Wrike is a responsive feature that assists internal and external partners in project monitoring and collaboration while decreasing posting and accounting page effort. It is simple to create a document with approvers so that everyone can read comments simultaneously and then contribute revisions. I also like the file comparison over looking at physical copies or even two pdf tabs.

I wish the search bar on the left side was still there so I could search by organizer rather than task; it would be quite beneficial to have extra instructional activities after the mix is completed for cutting-edge customers. I realize some individuals want to make to-do lists or utilize AI to see their chores, but it could be better to have a single choice that everyone must use.

The packaging system is excellent. It is more flexible than the soldier structure provided by other software. We made a reminder for a meeting and each meeting member added notes, in real time, to the task. Subsequently, we can assign tasks related to the event if necessary. The user interface is excellent, plus, the iPhone and iPad apps are excellent. I have not examined the Android apps, as we are Mac based, however, I bet they are as beautiful as the iOS ones. The email unification makes it simple to respond to a notification about a task from your inbox.

The cost is somewhat high. You should be required to perform most actions to justify the cost when there is a free version that has similar features. One shortcoming I wish Wrike had is the ability to assign a percentage of time to different groups.

Wrike offers a high-quality project management software with robust features and capabilities. It provides customizable workflows, extensive collaboration tools, and integration options with other applications. Wrike is particularly suitable for managing complex projects and facilitating efficient team collaboration.

The user interface of Wrike can be overwhelming for new users, requiring some time to fully grasp its functionalities. Additionally, Wrike's pricing may be slightly higher compared to some of its competitors, which may be a factor to consider for organizations with tighter budgets.

1. Collaboration2. Customizable dashboards 3. Integration with other tools4. Task management

Although Wrike lets users modify their dashboards and workflows, there are some modification restrictions, which may worry some users.

Custom fields are critical for tracking the exact data my team needs. Multiple views are possible depending how you work with the tasks. Wrike Proof is awesome for reviewing assets and tracking comments/feedback. General ease of use is wonderful. My team picked it up in no time and are now pros.

I wish there were more custom display options like conditional formatting of task titles and Gantt chart colors. That would make viewing and tracking large projects much faster.

Wrike is about as close to a "perfect" project management software for us as you can get. When buying a product, there are always going to be a few things that don't exactly work the way you'd like, but the number of those instances with Wrike are few and far between.

Nothing really, there are a few minor gripes about design decisions and a few very basic features that we (and other users) feel the product should have, but there is nothing major and they are all easily worked around.

I like that all communications are recorded in Wrike and make for an easy reference in case of questions. I really like the accountability it creates for outside parties using the application with our department. This has shut down a lot of "I didn't say that's" since we've implemented the program.

I would like to see the ability to insert documents such as Word or photos into the markup area of the online proofs. There are times where this would be more helpful than referencing a document that you have attached to the library.

Wrike excels at what it sets out to do: manage projects. It is flexible, powerful, and full-featured enough to adapt to virtually any use case, keeping teams on the same page and on-task. The UI is fresh and modern, and the software is iterated weekly with even tiny considerations that make life easier.

Wrike is a blank slate, so determining how your busy team will leverage the tool takes a ton of effort. Its interface, while pretty, is as complex as it needs to be to conform to a bevy of use cases. The learning curve for a team is steep, and because it takes months to see benefits, adoption is an exercise in discipline. For some members of the team who struggle with the complexity, managing the tool is a burden and Wrike remains more of an obstacle than a benefit. We've also had no luck getting real-time browser notifications to work; the team either relies on far too many Wrike-generated emails or just living in the tool itself to stay up-to-date.

Once deployed and your Space is setup, Wrike makes the management of project easy, especially with Templates for recurring projects.

For someone without some degree of understanding of deployment and setup, Wrike would be difficult to implement. The ability to mass edit tasks is lacking.

Detailed task management
Workload managment

See below including very poor customer service

The request form system. As a district of three community colleges, the district administrative center is the hub that provides customer service to the colleges. With request forms, we are able to get them to the appropriate person.

Calendars needs a refresh. It would be nice if we could add tasks directly to it in the smart calendar option (I know it still exists in classic but that is too much manual work).

We were looking for a full project management suite our PM was focused on a robust tool that met all of the PM standards and requirements. As we reviewed various software suites we found that although many met their needs, they were very difficult to use and understand for non-project oriented staff; this was critical for us many staff are required to interact with the Projects Division as part of their stakeholder and SME roles. We were very happy to see Wrike had a friendly and very usable interface that non-PM focused users could interact with easily.

As an admin level user for myself it is very easy to get 'lost' within Wrike, as I have access to all projects, tasks and PM features. Although note that this isn't a fault of the software but rather how we configured our environment and user access.

The tool itself is great. We used many project management tools before including the big names like JIRA, but ended up with wrike and using it now for around 4 years already.Around 2 years ago the features / billing got more standardized which allows us to use some features we really wanted, but were too expensive before (because they were coupled with other ones with no use for us). Now the tool is very useful including proper timetracking, workflow management and useful asset commenting inside tasks.

Account manager / success manager change very often. While this is pretty common in SaaS environment, it is very annoying, especially if you make arrangements with you current manager and then all of sudden there is a new one and everything you discussed before is out of the window.

First, this is a pretty good tool for:
1. Nested task lists that look like a project plan
2. Task board views (if not on the free plan)
3. Customer-facing task-list dashboards

The description for the Pro plan states clearly "Full project planning and collaboration" and for the business plan "Robust work management with customization and exec reporting".

But neither plan will total up work estimates for a project based on sub-task level of effort.

Let that sink in for a moment: a "full project planning" tool that does not total up expected effort for the project plan. Yes, you can get that, but only if you buy the Resource Allocation addon for another 15 per user. Resource allocation is not the same as basic project planning (which must include level of effort estimation)

Also, the interface is a bit clunky for quick-edits and quick-adds of sub-tasks.

Appreciate the flexibility and customization options that Wrike offers, allowing teams to tailor the tool to fit their specific needs and workflows. The platform's collaboration capabilities and real-time communication features also receive positive feedback, making it easier for team members to work together and share information.Additionally, Wrike's automation features are often praised, as they help teams save time and stay organized. The platform's user-friendly interface and easy-to-use task management system are also frequently mentioned as major benefits of using Wrike.

I noted that the pricing structure for Wrike can be a bit complex, with different pricing tiers and features available.

Wrike has been an incredibly helpful solution for my team. I love the flexibility of your platform, allowing us to customize our tasks and projects to our specific needs. It has an intuitive and easy-to-use interface that has helped our team collaborate more efficiently and stay organized on every project and task.

The number of features it offers can be difficult to understand at first, which can lead to some confusion. However, once you get used to the platform, you find that the learning curve is worth it and the software becomes easy to use.

I choose Wrike specifically for the ability to submit project requests. 99% of our projects have to go through some sort of compliance approval, and auditing through a bunch of emails and folders that hopefully had everything was a recipe for disaster. Wrike allows us to have reporting and automatically assign tasks It's incredibly, almost overwhelmingly customizable, so I can have my own workflows to manage website issues while print projects can have their own process, etc, and these templates are automatically assigned, filled out, and dated when the requester fills out the form. The dashboards are nice so you can customize how you want to view your projects, and you can also monitor your team's projects to make sure everything is moving along, and easily step in and request help. Another pro is the collaborator user role, so coworkers not in our department can track, comment, and answer questions within tasks without seeing the other projects, and all of their communication is attached to the project and on record for everyone, including compliance, and not just trapped in one person's email.

Set up is daunting. Although we paid for someone to help us set up the process, we quickly realized that their orientation instructions weren't suited for our situation at all, so it took a few weeks for us to get everything into place. And I don't think our situation was particularly unusual, we're an in-house marketing department that needed to accept tickets.

While Wrike is really good about constantly releasing updates, there are some common sense things that have yet to be ironed out, for example, someone requesting a project can set a due date in the past.

There are many functions that Wrike has, but above them is the excellent organization that it has, allowing each aspect of the program to be in the right place. Its search function is very complete, allowing a large number of entries. These two features make it almost impossible not to get what you're looking for within Wrike. It has excellent integration with Apple operating systems, both with Mac and iPhone, which allows us to be connected at all times. Wrike has a very user-friendly and intuitive interface so even long working hours are done easily and without causing so much stress on staff. Of course, their workflows are incredible and allow a total customization of them without having to be experts in the handling of this type of software.

Although it is a very complete software, there are things that should be improved, such as adding a quick edit option so that you do not have to open a task to edit it. The linking of tasks is not your best option, it tends to leave some doubts and although with time the user gets used to it, it must take a long time to adapt. It also needs to polish its integration with Gmail a bit since it tends to be very slow.

We were really impressed with how user-friendly and intuitive Wrike is. The user interface is easy to navigate, and all the features are clearly labeled and organized. We found it very easy to set up tasks and assign them to team members.We also loved that Wrike offers project templates, which makes it easy to quickly set up projects. The project templates are customizable, so you can easily tailor them to meet your team’s needs.The collaboration tools are another great feature of Wrike. With these tools, teams can easily keep track of conversations and tasks, assign tasks, and get feedback quickly. The software also offers a variety of integrations with popular tools like Slack, Google Drive, and Dropbox.

The only downside we experienced with Wrike is that the software can be a bit slow at times. We found that tasks and conversations sometimes took a while to load, which could be frustrating.We also found that the mobile app was a bit clunky and not as intuitive as the web version. It didn’t offer all the features that the web version does, and we found it to be a bit buggy.